During president Suharto's 32-year rule, Indonesians were constantly fed a seemingly indigestible diet of Pancasila, the five principles conceived during the struggle for independence which served as the philosophical bedrock of the future Indonesian state.
Foreign students, in particular, were taken aback at the way it occupied such a huge chunk of the curriculum at the country's command and staff college and other military institutions. Being able to "receive Pancasila in your heart", as the saying went, became something of a joke.
Not any more. In what may be a bid to win back social and political relevance, the mass Muslim organisation Nahdlatul Ulama has called for the reconsolidation of Pancasila to halt Indonesia's troubling slide into religious intolerance.
Last July, former vice-president Try Sutrisno, his fellow generals ranging from Wismoyo Arismunandar to Wiranto, former Supreme Court chief justice Bagir Manan and other retired senior officials signed a declaration urging all elements of society to return to the ways of Pancasila.
And earlier this month, armed forces chief Admiral Agus Suhartono, his service chiefs and majors from the 1999 and 2000 military academy classes held a panel discussion on "The Regeneration of Pancasila and its Relevance to the Future of the Defence Force."
The renewed focus on Pancasila is also shared among educationalists, worried that the loosening of its tenets has emboldened hardline Islamic groups to resort to extreme violence against minorities and civil society.
The education ministry will reintroduce a basic Pancasila class that was struck from the curriculum five years ago.
Much of the current discourse about Pancasila means different things to different people. In many cases, it doesn't touch on Islamic radicalism at all, but on the simple imperative of maintaining national unity and related concerns over the impact of globalisation and inequalities.
The military's panel discussion, for example, dwelt almost solely on Pancasila's "victory" over communism in 1965-66, a reaction to recent efforts to re-examine the bloody purge which claimed at least 500,000 lives.
After all, the keynote speaker was army chief of staff General Pramono Wibowo, the son of Lieutenant-General Sarwo Wibowo, considered the architect of the Indonesian Communist Party's destruction.
Juwono Sudarsono, a minister in post-Suharto administrations, says the rejection of Pancasila is not the issue when Islamic radicals perceive it to be overly serving the interests of Christians and minority business professionals.
"If you want to instill tolerance in society, you have to be able to address it in socio-economic terms," he points out. "Pancasila is seen to be too secular and too tolerant of market capitalism. Marginalisation among Muslims has been much more pronounced in the last 10 years, especially among middle-class and lower middle-class workers."
Analysts like the International Crisis Group's Sidney Jones are in two minds about how it can be applied in any meaningful sense. "Pancasila worked during Suharto's rule, not because of the power of the idea but because of the coercive apparatus that went with it," she argues.
There has to be a willingness to use the authority of the state again to push back against the idea of Islam as the only truth. Not in a coercive manner, but resolutely all the same.
It won't be easy, given the disturbing level of intolerance that has taken root among even mainstream Muslims. Democracy has allowed for a full flowering of Muslim beliefs and the re-emergence of a hardline minority campaigning for an Islamic state.
But few if any Islamic or political leaders will speak out against that, or are willing to question why institutions like Bank Indonesia and the Supreme Court have their own elegant government-funded mosques which inexorably link Islam and the state.
Similarly, where is Pancasila applicable when Shi'ite Muslims are forced to convert to mainstream Sunnism, and Home Affairs Minister Gamawan Fauzi insists that human rights conform to local values? And when President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono appears before the UN to defend draconian blasphemy laws?
Latest stories in this category
- Jakarta's secular tussle with hardline Islam
- During president Suharto's 32-year rule,..
- Obama in Myanmar: Questions that need answers
- Thailand and the ICC: Wrong reason, right idea
We Recommend
- Troops and 1,000 guards for Obama
- Huge security team with armoured limo, Black Hawk,..
- Buddhists offended by sexy magazine spread
- Big Data set for big growth
Comments conditions
Users are solely responsible for their comments.We reserve the right to remove any comment and revoke posting rights for any reason withou prior notice.
Article source: http://www.thethailandlinks.com/2012/11/16/jakartas-secular-tussle-with-hardline-islam/
0 comments:
Post a Comment